Between Algorithm and Adat: How Bugis-Makassar MSMEs Negotiate AI Marketing Through the Lens of Siri' na Pacce
DOI:
10.47353/ecbis.v4i3.308Published:
2026-04-29Downloads
Abstract
The rapid proliferation of AI-powered marketing technologies in emerging markets poses a fundamental challenge to culturally-grounded micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs): how can algorithmic imperatives be reconciled with indigenous value systems that define not only business practice but collective identity? Despite growing research on both AI adoption in SMEs and indigenous knowledge preservation, scholarship rarely examines how traditional values actively mediate rather than merely moderate commercial technology adoption. This study addresses that gap by investigating how MSMEs in Makassar City, Indonesia, negotiate AI marketing integration while preserving siri’ na pacce, the Bugis-Makassar philosophical framework centred on dignity (siri’) and solidarity (pacce). Employing interpretive phenomenology integrated with Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR), the study conducted 23 in-depth interviews and three focus group discussions with 44 MSME owners and key personnel across traditional culinary, artisan craft, ethnic fashion, and digital service sectors. Template analysis generated four overarching themes: (1) value-based technology discernment, wherein siri’ na pacce operates as an active epistemological filter for evaluating AI tools; (2) strategic selective adoption, wherein enterprises accept algorithmically aligned functions while rejecting culturally incompatible features; (3) cultural indigenization of technology, wherein AI systems are actively reoriented toward communal rather than individualistic ends; and (4) constrained agency under platform power, wherein algorithmic visibility systems penalise cultural non-conformity with market exclusion. These findings challenge technological determinism and advance decolonial computing theory by demonstrating that indigenous values simultaneously enable epistemological agency and are constrained by structural power asymmetries, a duality insufficiently theorised in prior technology adoption frameworks. The study calls for regulatory frameworks establishing indigenous data sovereignty, participatory AI co-design with local communities, and cooperative digital infrastructure as conditions for authentic, rather than performative, cultural integration.
Keywords:
AI marketing Cultural Negotiation Indigenous Knowledge Siri’ Na Pacce MSMEReferences
Abdullah, M. W., Tahir, A., & Ar, M. S. (2019). Local wisdom-based business: Integration of siri' na pacce and Islamic business ethics. Jurnal Iqtisaduna, 5(2), 229–249. https://doi.org/10.24252/iqtisaduna.v5i2.13249
Abrokwah-Larbi, K., & Awuku-Larbi, Y. (2024). The impact of artificial intelligence in marketing on the performance of business organizations: Evidence from SMEs in an emerging economy. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 16(4), 1090–1117. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-07-2022-0207
Al-Sheikh Hassan, M. (2025). Descriptive or interpretive? A reflexive framework for methodological choice and bracketing in phenomenology. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 24, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069251400060
Bawack, R. E., Roderick, S., Badhrus, A., Dennehy, D., & Corbett, J. (2025). Indigenous knowledge and information technology for sustainable development. Information Technology for Development, 31(2), 147–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2025.2472495
Blayone, T. J. B., & Mykhailenko, O. (2025). Using digital technologies for Indigenous sociocultural advancement in an era of AI: A systematic critical synthesis. Preservation, Digital Technology & Culture, 54(2), 135–157. https://doi.org/10.1515/pdtc-2024-0086
Bush, E. J., Singh, R. L., & Kooienga, S. (2019). Lived experiences of a community: Merging interpretive phenomenology and community-based participatory research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919875891
Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019). The costs of connection: How data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Stanford University Press.
Darmayanti, R. R., & Syukur, M. (2025). The role of women in the creative economy based on siri' na pacce values in the Bugis community of Makassar. RIGGS: Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business, 4(4), 1262–1269.
Darussalam, F. I. (2021). Siri na pacce dan identitas kebudayaan. An-Nisa, 14(1), 1–5.
Hartman, A., & Squires, V. (2024). Bridging perspectives: Utilizing interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) to inform and enhance social interventions. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241306284
Legault, G., & Bleau, D. (2025). Indigenizing or appropriating? Navigating the boundaries of institutional decolonization. Capitalism, Nature Socialism, 36(2), 71–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2024.2445586
Lim, W. M. (2025). What is qualitative research? An overview and guidelines. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 10(1), 100568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100568
McGurk, B., & Caquard, S. (2020). To what extent can online mapping be decolonizing? A journey throughout Indigenous cartography in Canada. The Canadian Geographer, 64(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12563
Ofosu-Asare, Y. (2025). Cognitive imperialism in artificial intelligence: Counteracting bias with indigenous epistemologies. AI & Society, 40(4), 3045–3061. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-02065-0
Reski, P., Nur, R., & Widayati, C. (2021). Local wisdom of Bugis Makassar siri' na pacce from millennials' glasses. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Social Sciences Education (ICSSE 2020) (pp. 180–184). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210222.038
Salas-Pilco, S. Z. (2025). Information technology (IT) and indigenous knowledge (IK) in Latin America: Pro-indigenous, para-indigenous, and per-indigenous IT-IK integration for development. Information Technology for Development, 31(2), 264–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2024.2442638
Salassa, D. I., Baga, L. M., & Etriya, E. (2023). The relationship of Bugis culture to financial access and training for women entrepreneurs in South Sulawesi. Jurnal Agribisnis Indonesia, 11(1), 48–63. https://doi.org/10.29244/jai.2023.11.1.48-63
Tella, A., Jatto, E. O., & Ajani, Y. A. (2025). Preserving indigenous knowledge: Leveraging digital technology and artificial intelligence. IFLA Journal, 51(1), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/03400352251342505
Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2012). Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1(1), 1–40.
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Hery Maulana Arif, Wiwin Riski Windarsari

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



