The Interaction Between Economic Interests and Law Formation: A Max Weber Perspective
Main Article Content
Deddi Fasmadhy Satiadharmanto
Yuda Widodo
Sofyan
Amin Cempokowulan
Saryono Anwar
This study explores the relationship between economic interests and legal formation through the lens of Max Weber's perspective. The key issue addressed is the extent to which economic factors influence legal structures and their reciprocal impact on economic systems. The objective is to analyze how economic rationality shapes lawmaking processes and the implications for modern transactions. The study employs a qualitative method, relying on textual analysis of Weber’s works and related legal theories. The findings reveal that economic interests are fundamental drivers of legal predictability, calculability, and stability, which are essential for fostering business growth and investment confidence. However, the tension between formal legal rationality and substantive justice poses challenges to achieving equity. These insights underscore the necessity of a structured legal framework that aligns with dynamic economic needs while ensuring fairness. The results contribute to a deeper understanding of the interplay between economics and law, offering guidance for policymakers to balance economic progress with social equity.
Aulia, R. (2018). Balancing competing interests and values. The Global Community Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence.
Baker, T., & Stratmann, T. (2021). Barriers to entry in the healthcare markets: Winners and losers from certificate-of-need laws. Journal of Socio-Economic Planning Sciences. (Sullivan, 2021; Della Porta, 2021).
Bickford, S. (2021). Barriers to entry in the healthcare markets: Winners and losers from certificate-of-need laws. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences.
Call, C. (2014). Across the Himalayas: The South Asia vector. In Russian Foreign Policy: Interests, Vectors, and Sectors.
Caporale, G. M., Rault, C., & Sova, A. (2021). Global and regional financial integration in emerging Asia: Evidence from stock markets. Global and Regional Financial Integration in Emerging Asia.
Darmodiharjo, T., & Sidharta, S. (2021). Hukum progresif dari Satjipto Rahardjo. Undang: Jurnal Hukum.
Ding, L., Gao, S., & Zhang, H. (2019). Social network analysis-based conflict relationship investigation and conflict degree-based consensus reaching process for large scale decision making using sparse representation. Information Fusion.
Della Porta, D., Popkova, E. G., & Bostan, A. (2021). Conclusions: Economic and legal management of modern economic systems’ innovative development: A view into the future. In The Economic and Legal Foundations of Managing Innovative Development in Modern Economic Systems. (Bartels & Grossman, 2021; Sudjono Dirdjosisworo, 2021; Alan Hunt, 2021).
Fitzgerald, S. (2021). Supporting investment climate reforms through Investment Promotion Policy Agencies.
Gumata, N., & Ndou, V. (2019). Capital flows, credit markets and growth in South Africa. (Bickford, 2021).
Kreide, R. (2017). Preventing military humanitarian intervention? John Rawls and Jürgen Habermas on a just global order. In Rawls and Law.
Lepsius, O. (2016). Interests and ideas. Max Weber’s allocation problem. In Max Weber and Institutional Theory.
Pound, G. (2021). Economic theories and institutional design. Principles of Banking Regulation.
Rachmawati, N. (2017). Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Economic Education and Entrepreneurship. (Schneider, 2021; Knott, 2021).
Sabatello, M. (2015). Regulating gamete donation in the U.S.: Ethical, legal and social implications. Laws.
Thakur, R. (2015-2016). Legal philosophy and legal pluralism. Law, Culture and Society.
Zaiets. (2019). Ensuring the functioning of system analysis in jurisprudence while integrating analytical methods of processing large data sets. Jurisprudence and Fundamentals of Legal Behaviour in Modern Civil Society.
